![]() ![]() demurs to the Cross-Complaint filed by Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant Minako American Corporation dba Minco Construction on the following grounds:ġ. Weissman reflects that the meet and confer requirement set forth in CCP 430.41 was satisfied.Ĭross-Defendant View Park Estates Development Inc. demurs to the First Amended Cross-Complaint filed by Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant Minako American Corporation dba Minco Construction.Ĭross-Defendant View Park Estates Development Inc.’s demurrer to the First Amended Cross-Complaint filed by Plaintiff/Cross-Complainant Minako American Corporation dba Minco Construction is SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the first causes of action and OVERRULED as to the third cause of action.Ĭross-Defendant is to answer the remaining cause of action in the First Amended Cross-Complaint within 10 days. Plaintiff then filed a Cross-Complaint for implied indemnity, contribution and declaratory relief against Clark Parker, the construction manager of the project.Ĭross-Defendant View Park Estates Development Inc. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has not paid Plaintiff for the site improvements performed by Plaintiff for a new charter school.ĭefendant filed a Cross-Complaint alleging that Plaintiff exceeded cost and timing provisions in the construction contract, and performed unacceptable work that will need to be redone/repaired. Case Number: ****0789 Hearing Date: NovemDept: 76 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |